Michelle Kuehner
Michelle Kuehner
Home » News » National News » Texas » What could possibly go wrong with multi-heir IRAs? | Opinion
Texas

What could possibly go wrong with multi-heir IRAs? | Opinion

Naming multiple beneficiaries on an IRA sounds harmless — almost thoughtful, even. But the moment more than one person or entity appears on that beneficiary form, a complicated chain of tax deadlines and rules kicks into gear.

Handle it well, and everyone walks away grateful. Handle it poorly, and you may unintentionally hand the IRS more control than any beneficiary wants.

Video Thumbnail

Multiple beneficiaries exist the second you list more than one name. People often do this because they want to divide their IRA among several heirs without juggling separate accounts. That part’s fine. But once more than one name is involved, the IRS shifts to rulebook mode, and the clock starts ticking.

The first challenge? Not all beneficiaries are created equal. Some are designated beneficiaries — actual human beings with life expectancies the IRS can measure. Others are non-designated beneficiaries such as charities, estates and certain trusts.

These are perfectly respectable heirs, but because they don’t have life expectancies, they can derail everyone else’s tax advantages if they linger on the account too long.

Which brings us to the first major deadline. By Sept. 30 of the year following the IRA owner’s death, the final list of designated beneficiaries must be determined.

Any non-designated beneficiaries should generally be cashed out before this date. If they’re still hanging around afterward, they can unintentionally block eligible beneficiaries from stretching distributions over their own life expectancies. Nothing like a surprise tax complication to bring people together — usually in frustration.

After that, the next big date arrives quickly. By Dec. 31 of that same year, each designated beneficiary needs their own properly titled inherited IRA. These accounts must keep the original owner’s name in the title, clearly identify themselves as inherited IRAs and use the beneficiary’s Social Security number. It’s not glamorous paperwork, but getting it right unlocks the best payout options.

Once the separate accounts are in place, the real advantage kicks in. Each eligible designated beneficiary identified by the Sept. 30 deadline can use their own single life expectancy to calculate required distributions — allowing them to maximize the “stretch.”

That’s the coveted scenario where the IRA can last for decades, giving beneficiaries the chance to keep taxes lower and growth compounding longer. The life-expectancy factor is set in the year after the IRA owner’s death and decreases by one each year after. If the sole beneficiary happens to be the spouse, they get to re-determine their life expectancy annually — but that’s a different article.

But what happens if those inherited IRAs aren’t split by the deadline? This is where things can unravel. Miss that Dec. 31 split and eligible designated beneficiaries may lose their chance to stretch payments. Instead, they can get stuck with the far less charming 10-year payout requirement — meaning the entire account must be drained within a decade. Not exactly a tax-planning victory.

Managing multiple beneficiaries doesn’t have to feel like a circus act. With the right timing, proper setup, and a little attention to detail, you can keep everyone’s tax benefits intact — and keep the IRS from adding unwanted plot twists.

Michelle Kuehner, a Chartered Financial Consultant and Master Certified Estate Planner, is the president of Personal Money Planning LLC, a Wichita Falls retirement planning and investment management firm.

This article originally appeared on Wichita Falls Times Record News: What could possibly go wrong with multi-heir IRAs? | Opinion

Reporting by Michelle Kuehner, Abilene Reporter-News / Wichita Falls Times Record News

USA TODAY Network via Reuters Connect

Image

By Michelle Kuehner, Abilene Reporter-News | USA TODAY Network

Related posts

Leave a Comment