Florida is being asked to vote itself into a government-made crisis.
In a three-day special session beginning June 1, the Legislature will take up a constitutional amendment that would phase out homestead property taxes and replace local revenue with a new state-controlled “grant program.” The program’s job would be to send money back to counties to cover the services property taxes pay for today. Voters would get the final word on the ballot in November.
But a property tax cut that requires a new grant program to keep the lights on is not a property tax cut. It is a tax shift.
Every dollar the government spends comes from somebody. Eliminate one tax without addressing the services it funds, and another tax will be coming behind it. State politicians just don’t know what kind of new tax, and who will pay it, yet.
The shift goes in one direction. Revenue collected from across Florida would be funneled through Tallahassee bank accounts and redistributed to counties that cannot generate enough on their own to cover core services. Taxpayers in some counties would, in effect, be paying for local services in others.
That is the same dynamic Florida has long protested in Washington, where our residents send more in federal tax dollars than the state receives back in federal spending. We ought to be candid about that tradeoff when we decide to do it within the state’s borders.
There is a second cost that does not show up in proponents’ press conferences. Today, when citizens want a new traffic light at a dangerous intersection, they call their county commissioner. Under the new structure, that conversation moves to a state bureaucrat’s office.
The current property tax system works precisely because it is local. Decisions are made close to the people who live with them. Dollars stay in the communities that raised them. Trust between residents and their local officials is built through that arrangement, year after year. Low taxes, common sense regulation, reliable local services, and decisions made close to home. It’s an arrangement that has worked for decades, in part because Florida has no state income tax. The amendment overrides it.
The trade-off is most visible in public safety, where the math will be the hardest to memory hole. Property taxes are the primary source of funding for sheriff’s deputies, fire and EMS, jails, and emergency response.
Under this amendment, public safety budgets would effectively be frozen at 2026 funding levels even as Florida’s population and calls for service climb. There may not be mass layoffs, just no new hires, slower replacement of equipment, smaller fleets, longer response times, and inflation steadily eroding what future resources can afford.
Property tax relief has been talked about in Tallahassee for nearly a year. The actual plan arrived last week with three session days to consider it. Lawmakers who vote yes will not be remembered for delivering tax relief. They will be remembered for authoring a monumental tax shift and etching a government-made crisis into the Florida Constitution, where their successors will spend years trying to clean it up.
Al Lawson, Jr., is a former U.S. congressman from Tallahassee.
JOIN THE CONVERSATION
Send letters to the editor (up to 200 words) or Your Turn columns (500-550 words) to letters@tallahassee.com. Please include your address for verification purposes only, and if you send a Your Turn, also include a photo and 1-2 line bio of yourself. You can also submit anonymous Zing!s at Tallahassee.com/Zing.Submissions are published on a space-available basis. All submissions may be edited for content, clarity and length, and may also be published by any part of the USA TODAY NETWORK.
This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: A property tax crisis, made in Tallahassee | Opinion
Reporting by Al Lawson, Jr., Your Turn / Tallahassee Democrat
USA TODAY Network via Reuters Connect
